Belarus vs Nigeria: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Belarus
54,492 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nigeria
53,748 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Belarus rank
105th
Nigeria rank
106th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Belarus
  • Nigeria
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019952021

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 54,492 current US$ per square kilometre against 53,748 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 744 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 105th and Nigeria ranks 106th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Nigeria Difference Ahead
1990s 10,528 current US$ per square kilometre 3,794 current US$ per square kilometre 6,734 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 20,540 current US$ per square kilometre 13,853 current US$ per square kilometre 6,687 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 44,825 current US$ per square kilometre 43,701 current US$ per square kilometre 1,124 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 51,422 current US$ per square kilometre 52,369 current US$ per square kilometre 947.05 current US$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Belarus or Nigeria?
Belarus, at 54,492 current US$ per square kilometre against 53,748 current US$ per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Belarus and Nigeria?
744 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Belarus and Nigeria rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Belarus ranks 105th and Nigeria ranks 106th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Nigeria: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nigeria/">Belarus vs Nigeria: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.