Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Bahamas
60,386 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
New Caledonia
66,726 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Bahamas rank
100th
New Caledonia rank
98th

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Bahamas
  • New Caledonia
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k197019952021

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 66,726 current US$ per square kilometre against 60,386 current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 6,340 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 100th and New Caledonia ranks 98th of 204 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 3,336 current US$ per square kilometre 3,373 current US$ per square kilometre 37.56 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 11,521 current US$ per square kilometre 6,146 current US$ per square kilometre 5,375 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 24,756 current US$ per square kilometre 17,349 current US$ per square kilometre 7,408 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 63,553 current US$ per square kilometre 36,976 current US$ per square kilometre 26,577 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 85,915 current US$ per square kilometre 59,763 current US$ per square kilometre 26,152 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 59,397 current US$ per square kilometre 64,665 current US$ per square kilometre 5,268 current US$ per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Bahamas or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 66,726 current US$ per square kilometre against 60,386 current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Bahamas and New Caledonia?
6,340 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and New Caledonia?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Bahamas and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Bahamas ranks 100th and New Caledonia ranks 98th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/new-caledonia/">Bahamas vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.