Aruba vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per

Aruba
2.06 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
United Kingdom
1.96 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Aruba rank
20th
United Kingdom rank
22nd

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per over time

  • Aruba
  • United Kingdom
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M197019952021

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 2.06 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.96 million current US$ per square kilometre in United Kingdom, a difference of 96,300 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1986 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Aruba ranks 20th and United Kingdom ranks 22nd of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1980s 287,905 current US$ per square kilometre 508,311 current US$ per square kilometre 220,406 current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
1990s 721,225 current US$ per square kilometre 770,674 current US$ per square kilometre 49,449 current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
2000s 1.32 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.32 million current US$ per square kilometre 2,632 current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
2010s 1.73 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.68 million current US$ per square kilometre 51,298 current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 1.88 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.88 million current US$ per square kilometre 2,725 current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per, Aruba or United Kingdom?
Aruba, at 2.06 million current US$ per square kilometre against 1.96 million current US$ per square kilometre in United Kingdom as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per between Aruba and United Kingdom?
96,300 current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and United Kingdom?
36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
How do Aruba and United Kingdom rank globally for adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current us$), per?
Aruba ranks 20th and United Kingdom ranks 22nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-consumption-of-fixed-capital-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/united-kingdom/">Aruba vs United Kingdom: Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 8,915 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.