Turks and Caicos Islands vs Vanuatu: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Turks and Caicos Islands
9.90 million current US$
in 2021
Vanuatu
9.72 million current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
196th
Vanuatu rank
197th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Vanuatu
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M199020052021

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 9.90 million current US$ against 9.72 million current US$ in Vanuatu, a difference of 183,210 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 196th and Vanuatu ranks 197th of 209 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 1.25 million current US$ 2.14 million current US$ 890,758 current US$ Vanuatu
2010s 7.40 million current US$ 5.47 million current US$ 1.92 million current US$ Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 9.30 million current US$ 9.22 million current US$ 86,215 current US$ Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Turks and Caicos Islands or Vanuatu?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 9.90 million current US$ against 9.72 million current US$ in Vanuatu as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Turks and Caicos Islands and Vanuatu?
183,210 current US$, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Vanuatu?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Vanuatu rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 196th and Vanuatu ranks 197th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Vanuatu: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/turks-and-caicos-islands/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/turks-and-caicos-islands/vanuatu/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Vanuatu: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.