Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Saint Kitts and Nevis
8.81 million current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
9.90 million current US$
in 2021
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
200th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
197th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199020052021

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 9.90 million current US$ against 8.81 million current US$ in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1.09 million current US$.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 200th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 197th of 210 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 6.90 million current US$ 1.25 million current US$ 5.65 million current US$ Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 8.69 million current US$ 7.40 million current US$ 1.29 million current US$ Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 8.73 million current US$ 9.30 million current US$ 567,975 current US$ Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 9.90 million current US$ against 8.81 million current US$ in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turks and Caicos Islands?
1.09 million current US$, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turks and Caicos Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 200th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 197th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/st-kitts-and-nevis/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/st-kitts-and-nevis/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.