Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Papua New Guinea
337.18 million current US$
in 2021
Zambia
358.42 million current US$
in 2021
Papua New Guinea rank
121st
Zambia rank
119th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zambia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199020052021

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 358.42 million current US$ against 337.18 million current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 21.24 million current US$.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zambia ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 121st and Zambia ranks 119th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 34.39 million current US$ 34.17 million current US$ 220,330 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 101.47 million current US$ 48.35 million current US$ 53.11 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 220.85 million current US$ 178.57 million current US$ 42.28 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 324.76 million current US$ 328.84 million current US$ 4.08 million current US$ Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Papua New Guinea or Zambia?
Zambia, at 358.42 million current US$ against 337.18 million current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
21.24 million current US$, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Papua New Guinea ranks 121st and Zambia ranks 119th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/papua-new-guinea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/papua-new-guinea/zambia/">Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.