Marshall Islands vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Marshall Islands
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 8.31 million current US$ against 7.13 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.18 million current US$.
That makes Marshall Islands's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 202nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 204th of 210 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.43 million current US$ | 745,055 current US$ | 684,578 current US$ | Marshall Islands |
| 2000s | 2.92 million current US$ | 1.69 million current US$ | 1.23 million current US$ | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 5.49 million current US$ | 4.32 million current US$ | 1.17 million current US$ | Marshall Islands |
| 2020s | 7.94 million current US$ | 6.83 million current US$ | 1.11 million current US$ | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Marshall Islands or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Marshall Islands, at 8.31 million current US$ against 7.13 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Marshall Islands and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.18 million current US$, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
- How do Marshall Islands and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Marshall Islands ranks 202nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 204th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.