Malta vs Puerto Rico: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Malta
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Malta currently reports 57.46 million current US$ against 56.91 million current US$ in Puerto Rico, a difference of 547,700 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 163rd and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 209 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Puerto Rico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.91 million current US$ | 13.75 million current US$ | 22.16 million current US$ | Malta |
| 2000s | 58.54 million current US$ | 51.88 million current US$ | 6.66 million current US$ | Malta |
| 2010s | 68.28 million current US$ | 99.42 million current US$ | 31.14 million current US$ | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 56.72 million current US$ | 53.91 million current US$ | 2.81 million current US$ | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Malta or Puerto Rico?
- Malta, at 57.46 million current US$ against 56.91 million current US$ in Puerto Rico as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Malta and Puerto Rico?
- 547,700 current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Puerto Rico?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Malta and Puerto Rico rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Malta ranks 163rd and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.