Maldives vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Maldives
96.73 million current US$
in 2021
South Sudan
80.65 million current US$
in 2021
Maldives rank
154th
South Sudan rank
156th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Maldives
  • South Sudan
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199020052021

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 96.73 million current US$ against 80.65 million current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 16.08 million current US$.

That makes Maldives's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was South Sudan ahead.

Maldives ranks 154th and South Sudan ranks 156th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives South Sudan Difference Ahead
1990s 3.98 million current US$ 5.67 million current US$ 1.69 million current US$ South Sudan
2000s 16.70 million current US$ 21.38 million current US$ 4.68 million current US$ South Sudan
2010s 52.44 million current US$ 53.57 million current US$ 1.13 million current US$ South Sudan
2020s 79.13 million current US$ 77.15 million current US$ 1.98 million current US$ Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Maldives or South Sudan?
Maldives, at 96.73 million current US$ against 80.65 million current US$ in South Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Maldives and South Sudan?
16.08 million current US$, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and South Sudan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Maldives and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Maldives ranks 154th and South Sudan ranks 156th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/maldives/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/maldives/south-sudan/">Maldives vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.