Liechtenstein vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Liechtenstein
5.85 million current US$
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe
7.13 million current US$
in 2021
Liechtenstein rank
207th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
204th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Liechtenstein
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M199020052021

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 7.13 million current US$ against 5.85 million current US$ in Liechtenstein, a difference of 1.28 million current US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Liechtenstein's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Liechtenstein ahead.

Liechtenstein ranks 207th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 204th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Liechtenstein averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liechtenstein Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 3.20 million current US$ 720,678 current US$ 2.48 million current US$ Liechtenstein
2000s 5.03 million current US$ 1.69 million current US$ 3.34 million current US$ Liechtenstein
2010s 5.68 million current US$ 4.32 million current US$ 1.36 million current US$ Liechtenstein
2020s 5.78 million current US$ 6.83 million current US$ 1.05 million current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Liechtenstein or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 7.13 million current US$ against 5.85 million current US$ in Liechtenstein as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Liechtenstein and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.28 million current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Sao Tome and Principe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Liechtenstein and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Liechtenstein ranks 207th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 204th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liechtenstein vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/liechtenstein/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/liechtenstein/sao-tome-and-principe/">Liechtenstein vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.