Kiribati vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Kiribati
4.48 million current US$
in 2021
Nauru
2.61 million current US$
in 2021
Kiribati rank
207th
Nauru rank
208th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Kiribati
  • Nauru
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M199020052021

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 4.48 million current US$ against 2.61 million current US$ in Nauru, a difference of 1.88 million current US$.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.7 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nauru ahead.

Kiribati ranks 207th and Nauru ranks 208th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Nauru Difference Ahead
1990s 410,535 current US$ 1.62 million current US$ 1.21 million current US$ Nauru
2000s 1.20 million current US$ 1.39 million current US$ 186,714 current US$ Nauru
2010s 2.39 million current US$ 1.85 million current US$ 537,161 current US$ Kiribati
2020s 4.22 million current US$ 2.55 million current US$ 1.67 million current US$ Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Kiribati or Nauru?
Kiribati, at 4.48 million current US$ against 2.61 million current US$ in Nauru as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Kiribati and Nauru?
1.88 million current US$, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Kiribati ranks 207th and Nauru ranks 208th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/kiribati/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/kiribati/naoero/">Kiribati vs Nauru: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.