Kiribati vs Liechtenstein: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Kiribati
4.48 million current US$
in 2021
Liechtenstein
5.85 million current US$
in 2021
Kiribati rank
207th
Liechtenstein rank
206th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Kiribati
  • Liechtenstein
02.0M4.0M6.0M199020052021

How they compare

Liechtenstein currently reports 5.85 million current US$ against 4.48 million current US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 1.36 million current US$.

That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.3 times Kiribati's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 207th and Liechtenstein ranks 206th of 209 countries.

Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1990s 410,535 current US$ 3.20 million current US$ 2.79 million current US$ Liechtenstein
2000s 1.20 million current US$ 5.03 million current US$ 3.83 million current US$ Liechtenstein
2010s 2.39 million current US$ 5.68 million current US$ 3.29 million current US$ Liechtenstein
2020s 4.22 million current US$ 5.78 million current US$ 1.56 million current US$ Liechtenstein

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Kiribati or Liechtenstein?
Liechtenstein, at 5.85 million current US$ against 4.48 million current US$ in Kiribati as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Kiribati and Liechtenstein?
1.36 million current US$, with Liechtenstein ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Liechtenstein?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Kiribati and Liechtenstein rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Kiribati ranks 207th and Liechtenstein ranks 206th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Liechtenstein: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/kiribati/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/kiribati/liechtenstein/">Kiribati vs Liechtenstein: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.