Jamaica vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Jamaica
359.65 million current US$
in 2021
Papua New Guinea
337.18 million current US$
in 2021
Jamaica rank
118th
Papua New Guinea rank
121st

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Jamaica
  • Papua New Guinea
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199020052021

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 359.65 million current US$ against 337.18 million current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 22.47 million current US$.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 118th and Papua New Guinea ranks 121st of 210 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 130.64 million current US$ 34.39 million current US$ 96.26 million current US$ Jamaica
2000s 237.15 million current US$ 101.47 million current US$ 135.68 million current US$ Jamaica
2010s 260.39 million current US$ 220.85 million current US$ 39.54 million current US$ Jamaica
2020s 340.02 million current US$ 324.76 million current US$ 15.26 million current US$ Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Jamaica or Papua New Guinea?
Jamaica, at 359.65 million current US$ against 337.18 million current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Jamaica and Papua New Guinea?
22.47 million current US$, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Papua New Guinea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Jamaica and Papua New Guinea rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Jamaica ranks 118th and Papua New Guinea ranks 121st of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/jamaica/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/jamaica/papua-new-guinea/">Jamaica vs Papua New Guinea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.