Hong Kong, China vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Sweden
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.50 billion current US$ against 1.46 billion current US$ in Sweden, a difference of 36.38 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 70th of 210 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 586.94 million current US$ | 861.90 million current US$ | 274.97 million current US$ | Sweden |
| 2000s | 978.39 million current US$ | 1.14 billion current US$ | 165.90 million current US$ | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1.53 billion current US$ | 1.37 billion current US$ | 164.66 million current US$ | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 1.44 billion current US$ | 1.42 billion current US$ | 24.92 million current US$ | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Hong Kong, China or Sweden?
- Hong Kong, China, at 1.50 billion current US$ against 1.46 billion current US$ in Sweden as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Hong Kong, China and Sweden?
- 36.38 million current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 70th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.