Hong Kong, China vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Hong Kong, China
1.50 billion current US$
in 2021
Norway
1.59 billion current US$
in 2021
Hong Kong, China rank
69th
Norway rank
67th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Norway
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B197019952021

How they compare

Norway currently reports 1.59 billion current US$ against 1.50 billion current US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 86.82 million current US$.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 69th and Norway ranks 67th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 586.94 million current US$ 510.32 million current US$ 76.62 million current US$ Hong Kong, China
2000s 978.39 million current US$ 836.12 million current US$ 142.27 million current US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 1.53 billion current US$ 1.33 billion current US$ 204.41 million current US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.44 billion current US$ 1.53 billion current US$ 84.18 million current US$ Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Hong Kong, China or Norway?
Norway, at 1.59 billion current US$ against 1.50 billion current US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Hong Kong, China and Norway?
86.82 million current US$, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Norway?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Hong Kong, China and Norway rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Hong Kong, China ranks 69th and Norway ranks 67th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/">Hong Kong, China vs Norway: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.