Grenada vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Grenada
12.38 million current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
9.90 million current US$
in 2021
Grenada rank
194th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
196th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Grenada
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199020052021

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 12.38 million current US$ against 9.90 million current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 2.48 million current US$.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 194th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 196th of 209 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 7.69 million current US$ 1.25 million current US$ 6.44 million current US$ Grenada
2010s 10.53 million current US$ 7.40 million current US$ 3.13 million current US$ Grenada
2020s 11.96 million current US$ 9.30 million current US$ 2.65 million current US$ Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Grenada or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Grenada, at 12.38 million current US$ against 9.90 million current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Grenada and Turks and Caicos Islands?
2.48 million current US$, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Turks and Caicos Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Grenada and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Grenada ranks 194th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 196th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/grenada/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/grenada/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Grenada vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.