Eritrea vs Faroe Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Eritrea
42.97 million current US$
in 2021
Faroe Islands
37.91 million current US$
in 2021
Eritrea rank
170th
Faroe Islands rank
173rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Eritrea
  • Faroe Islands
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199220062021

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 42.97 million current US$ against 37.91 million current US$ in Faroe Islands, a difference of 5.06 million current US$.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Eritrea ranks 170th and Faroe Islands ranks 173rd of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Faroe Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Faroe Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 10.90 million current US$ 10.38 million current US$ 517,476 current US$ Eritrea
2000s 13.36 million current US$ 16.18 million current US$ 2.82 million current US$ Faroe Islands
2010s 23.56 million current US$ 26.46 million current US$ 2.90 million current US$ Faroe Islands
2020s 40.83 million current US$ 35.83 million current US$ 5.00 million current US$ Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Eritrea or Faroe Islands?
Eritrea, at 42.97 million current US$ against 37.91 million current US$ in Faroe Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Eritrea and Faroe Islands?
5.06 million current US$, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Faroe Islands?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Eritrea and Faroe Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Eritrea ranks 170th and Faroe Islands ranks 173rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Faroe Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/eritrea/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/eritrea/faroe-islands/">Eritrea vs Faroe Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.