Ecuador vs Switzerland: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Ecuador
1.65 billion current US$
in 2021
Switzerland
1.59 billion current US$
in 2021
Ecuador rank
65th
Switzerland rank
66th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Ecuador
  • Switzerland
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199020052021

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1.65 billion current US$ against 1.59 billion current US$ in Switzerland, a difference of 57.12 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Switzerland ahead.

Ecuador ranks 65th and Switzerland ranks 66th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Switzerland Difference Ahead
1990s 304.46 million current US$ 657.55 million current US$ 353.10 million current US$ Switzerland
2000s 645.06 million current US$ 1.02 billion current US$ 377.23 million current US$ Switzerland
2010s 1.35 billion current US$ 1.38 billion current US$ 30.83 million current US$ Switzerland
2020s 1.58 billion current US$ 1.54 billion current US$ 38.99 million current US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Ecuador or Switzerland?
Ecuador, at 1.65 billion current US$ against 1.59 billion current US$ in Switzerland as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Ecuador and Switzerland?
57.12 million current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Switzerland?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Ecuador and Switzerland rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Ecuador ranks 65th and Switzerland ranks 66th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Switzerland: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/ecuador/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/ecuador/switzerland/">Ecuador vs Switzerland: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.