Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Cuba
988.44 million current US$
in 2021
Sri Lanka
1.10 billion current US$
in 2021
Cuba rank
82nd
Sri Lanka rank
79th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Cuba
  • Sri Lanka
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199020052021

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 1.10 billion current US$ against 988.44 million current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 115.38 million current US$.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 82nd and Sri Lanka ranks 79th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 384.62 million current US$ 100.00 million current US$ 284.62 million current US$ Cuba
2000s 613.48 million current US$ 285.02 million current US$ 328.46 million current US$ Cuba
2010s 942.59 million current US$ 660.68 million current US$ 281.91 million current US$ Cuba
2020s 967.08 million current US$ 1.04 billion current US$ 77.14 million current US$ Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Cuba or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 1.10 billion current US$ against 988.44 million current US$ in Cuba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Cuba and Sri Lanka?
115.38 million current US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Cuba ranks 82nd and Sri Lanka ranks 79th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/cuba/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/cuba/sri-lanka/">Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.