Congo vs Latvia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Congo
325.16 million current US$
in 2021
Latvia
320.09 million current US$
in 2021
Congo rank
122nd
Latvia rank
123rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Congo
  • Latvia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199020052021

How they compare

Congo currently reports 325.16 million current US$ against 320.09 million current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 5.07 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Latvia ahead.

Congo ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 123rd of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 47.11 million current US$ 164.50 million current US$ 117.39 million current US$ Latvia
2000s 93.92 million current US$ 176.83 million current US$ 82.90 million current US$ Latvia
2010s 197.29 million current US$ 259.19 million current US$ 61.90 million current US$ Latvia
2020s 312.14 million current US$ 310.07 million current US$ 2.08 million current US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Congo or Latvia?
Congo, at 325.16 million current US$ against 320.09 million current US$ in Latvia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Congo and Latvia?
5.07 million current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Congo and Latvia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Congo ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 123rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Latvia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/congo-rep/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/congo-rep/latvia/">Congo vs Latvia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.