Central African Republic vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Central African Republic
12.65 million current US$
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
9.90 million current US$
in 2021
Central African Republic rank
194th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
197th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M199020052021

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 12.65 million current US$ against 9.90 million current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 2.75 million current US$.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 194th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 197th of 210 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 5.11 million current US$ 1.25 million current US$ 3.86 million current US$ Central African Republic
2010s 6.62 million current US$ 7.40 million current US$ 781,143 current US$ Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 11.80 million current US$ 9.30 million current US$ 2.50 million current US$ Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Central African Republic or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Central African Republic, at 12.65 million current US$ against 9.90 million current US$ in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Central African Republic and Turks and Caicos Islands?
2.75 million current US$, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Turks and Caicos Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Central African Republic and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Central African Republic ranks 194th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 197th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/central-african-republic/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/central-african-republic/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Central African Republic vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.