Central African Republic vs Grenada: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Central African Republic
12.65 million current US$
in 2021
Grenada
12.38 million current US$
in 2021
Central African Republic rank
193rd
Grenada rank
194th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Grenada
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199020052021

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 12.65 million current US$ against 12.38 million current US$ in Grenada, a difference of 272,800 current US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 193rd and Grenada ranks 194th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Grenada Difference Ahead
1990s 2.64 million current US$ 2.62 million current US$ 17,150 current US$ Central African Republic
2000s 5.04 million current US$ 7.31 million current US$ 2.26 million current US$ Grenada
2010s 6.62 million current US$ 10.53 million current US$ 3.92 million current US$ Grenada
2020s 11.80 million current US$ 11.96 million current US$ 152,700 current US$ Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Central African Republic or Grenada?
Central African Republic, at 12.65 million current US$ against 12.38 million current US$ in Grenada as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Central African Republic and Grenada?
272,800 current US$, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Grenada?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Central African Republic and Grenada rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Central African Republic ranks 193rd and Grenada ranks 194th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Grenada: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/central-african-republic/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/central-african-republic/grenada/">Central African Republic vs Grenada: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.