Canada vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Canada
25.30 billion current US$
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
22.93 billion current US$
in 2021
Canada rank
10th
Saudi Arabia rank
11th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Canada
  • Saudi Arabia
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B25.0B199020052021

How they compare

Canada currently reports 25.30 billion current US$ against 22.93 billion current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 2.36 billion current US$.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 11th of 209 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 6.76 billion current US$ 3.16 billion current US$ 3.60 billion current US$ Canada
2000s 12.31 billion current US$ 7.40 billion current US$ 4.91 billion current US$ Canada
2010s 19.26 billion current US$ 17.83 billion current US$ 1.43 billion current US$ Canada
2020s 24.11 billion current US$ 21.96 billion current US$ 2.15 billion current US$ Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Canada or Saudi Arabia?
Canada, at 25.30 billion current US$ against 22.93 billion current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Canada and Saudi Arabia?
2.36 billion current US$, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Saudi Arabia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Canada and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Canada ranks 10th and Saudi Arabia ranks 11th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/canada/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/canada/saudi-arabia/">Canada vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.