Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Cameroon
440.12 million current US$
in 2021
Zimbabwe
499.61 million current US$
in 2021
Cameroon rank
105th
Zimbabwe rank
102nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Cameroon
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M199020052021

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 499.61 million current US$ against 440.12 million current US$ in Cameroon, a difference of 59.49 million current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 209 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 76.38 million current US$ 237.93 million current US$ 161.55 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 128.78 million current US$ 236.02 million current US$ 107.24 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 286.27 million current US$ 397.10 million current US$ 110.83 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 419.25 million current US$ 471.96 million current US$ 52.70 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Cameroon or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 499.61 million current US$ against 440.12 million current US$ in Cameroon as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Cameroon and Zimbabwe?
59.49 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Cameroon and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Cameroon ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/cameroon/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/cameroon/zimbabwe/">Cameroon vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.