Burundi vs Faroe Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Burundi
38.48 million current US$
in 2021
Faroe Islands
37.91 million current US$
in 2021
Burundi rank
172nd
Faroe Islands rank
173rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Burundi
  • Faroe Islands
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M199020052021

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 38.48 million current US$ against 37.91 million current US$ in Faroe Islands, a difference of 567,100 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Burundi ranks 172nd and Faroe Islands ranks 173rd of 209 countries.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Faroe Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 3.20 million current US$ 10.38 million current US$ 7.19 million current US$ Faroe Islands
2000s 4.20 million current US$ 16.18 million current US$ 11.98 million current US$ Faroe Islands
2010s 16.21 million current US$ 26.46 million current US$ 10.25 million current US$ Faroe Islands
2020s 35.67 million current US$ 35.83 million current US$ 160,000 current US$ Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Burundi or Faroe Islands?
Burundi, at 38.48 million current US$ against 37.91 million current US$ in Faroe Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Burundi and Faroe Islands?
567,100 current US$, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Faroe Islands?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Burundi and Faroe Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Burundi ranks 172nd and Faroe Islands ranks 173rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Faroe Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/burundi/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/burundi/faroe-islands/">Burundi vs Faroe Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.