Burkina Faso vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Burkina Faso
261.65 million current US$
in 2021
New Caledonia
257.21 million current US$
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
131st
New Caledonia rank
132nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • New Caledonia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197019952021

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 261.65 million current US$ against 257.21 million current US$ in New Caledonia, a difference of 4.44 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 131st and New Caledonia ranks 132nd of 210 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 9.39 million current US$ 25.60 million current US$ 16.21 million current US$ New Caledonia
2000s 28.56 million current US$ 60.85 million current US$ 32.28 million current US$ New Caledonia
2010s 124.66 million current US$ 155.13 million current US$ 30.47 million current US$ New Caledonia
2020s 241.86 million current US$ 245.98 million current US$ 4.12 million current US$ New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Burkina Faso or New Caledonia?
Burkina Faso, at 261.65 million current US$ against 257.21 million current US$ in New Caledonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Burkina Faso and New Caledonia?
4.44 million current US$, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and New Caledonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Burkina Faso and New Caledonia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Burkina Faso ranks 131st and New Caledonia ranks 132nd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/burkina-faso/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/burkina-faso/new-caledonia/">Burkina Faso vs New Caledonia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.