Botswana vs Mozambique: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Botswana
372.96 million current US$
in 2021
Mozambique
389.00 million current US$
in 2021
Botswana rank
115th
Mozambique rank
112th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Botswana
  • Mozambique
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199020052021

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 389.00 million current US$ against 372.96 million current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 16.04 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 115th and Mozambique ranks 112th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 48.15 million current US$ 17.53 million current US$ 30.62 million current US$ Botswana
2000s 94.58 million current US$ 43.93 million current US$ 50.64 million current US$ Botswana
2010s 206.46 million current US$ 189.16 million current US$ 17.31 million current US$ Botswana
2020s 334.48 million current US$ 361.30 million current US$ 26.82 million current US$ Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Botswana or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 389.00 million current US$ against 372.96 million current US$ in Botswana as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Botswana and Mozambique?
16.04 million current US$, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mozambique?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Botswana and Mozambique rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Botswana ranks 115th and Mozambique ranks 112th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mozambique: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/botswana/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/botswana/mozambique/">Botswana vs Mozambique: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.