Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Bosnia and Herzegovina
947.00 million current US$
in 2021
Sudan
963.33 million current US$
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
90th
Sudan rank
87th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Sudan
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B199020052021

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 963.33 million current US$ against 947.00 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 16.33 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Sudan ranks 87th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Sudan Difference Ahead
1990s 164.29 million current US$ 70.13 million current US$ 94.16 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 390.47 million current US$ 249.26 million current US$ 141.20 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 742.63 million current US$ 632.16 million current US$ 110.47 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 894.99 million current US$ 920.76 million current US$ 25.77 million current US$ Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sudan?
Sudan, at 963.33 million current US$ against 947.00 million current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sudan?
16.33 million current US$, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sudan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Sudan ranks 87th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sudan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.