Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Bosnia and Herzegovina
947.00 million current US$
in 2021
Nepal
737.05 million current US$
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
90th
Nepal rank
92nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Nepal
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B199020052021

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 947.00 million current US$ against 737.05 million current US$ in Nepal, a difference of 209.96 million current US$.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.3 times Nepal's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Nepal ranks 92nd of 210 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 164.29 million current US$ 27.98 million current US$ 136.31 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 390.47 million current US$ 70.37 million current US$ 320.09 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 742.63 million current US$ 314.55 million current US$ 428.08 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 894.99 million current US$ 671.45 million current US$ 223.55 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Nepal?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 947.00 million current US$ against 737.05 million current US$ in Nepal as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal?
209.96 million current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Nepal rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Nepal ranks 92nd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/nepal/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Nepal: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,886 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.