Bhutan vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time
- Bhutan
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 57.46 million current US$ against 48.42 million current US$ in Bhutan, a difference of 9.03 million current US$.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 165th and Malta ranks 163rd of 209 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.39 million current US$ | 35.91 million current US$ | 33.52 million current US$ | Malta |
| 2000s | 6.55 million current US$ | 58.54 million current US$ | 51.99 million current US$ | Malta |
| 2010s | 27.46 million current US$ | 68.28 million current US$ | 40.82 million current US$ | Malta |
| 2020s | 45.06 million current US$ | 56.72 million current US$ | 11.66 million current US$ | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Bhutan or Malta?
- Malta, at 57.46 million current US$ against 48.42 million current US$ in Bhutan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Bhutan and Malta?
- 9.03 million current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Malta?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Bhutan and Malta rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
- Bhutan ranks 165th and Malta ranks 163rd of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.