Belarus vs North Korea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Belarus
2.58 billion current US$
in 2021
North Korea
2.65 billion current US$
in 2021
Belarus rank
53rd
North Korea rank
51st

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Belarus
  • North Korea
1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B199020052021

How they compare

North Korea currently reports 2.65 billion current US$ against 2.58 billion current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 70.05 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was North Korea ahead.

Belarus ranks 53rd and North Korea ranks 51st of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and North Korea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus North Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 1.04 billion current US$ 1.29 billion current US$ 246.04 million current US$ North Korea
2000s 1.28 billion current US$ 1.63 billion current US$ 345.13 million current US$ North Korea
2010s 2.00 billion current US$ 1.40 billion current US$ 598.87 million current US$ Belarus
2020s 2.48 billion current US$ 2.53 billion current US$ 52.12 million current US$ North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Belarus or North Korea?
North Korea, at 2.65 billion current US$ against 2.58 billion current US$ in Belarus as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Belarus and North Korea?
70.05 million current US$, with North Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and North Korea?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Belarus and North Korea rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Belarus ranks 53rd and North Korea ranks 51st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs North Korea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/belarus/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/belarus/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Belarus vs North Korea: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.