Bahamas vs Macao: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Bahamas
108.83 million current US$
in 2021
Macao
119.95 million current US$
in 2021
Bahamas rank
147th
Macao rank
146th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Bahamas
  • Macao
050.0M100.0M150.0M197019952021

How they compare

Macao currently reports 119.95 million current US$ against 108.83 million current US$ in Bahamas, a difference of 11.12 million current US$.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 147th and Macao ranks 146th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Macao in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Macao Difference Ahead
1990s 32.31 million current US$ 18.55 million current US$ 13.76 million current US$ Bahamas
2000s 61.71 million current US$ 42.36 million current US$ 19.35 million current US$ Bahamas
2010s 87.89 million current US$ 77.75 million current US$ 10.14 million current US$ Bahamas
2020s 99.65 million current US$ 114.88 million current US$ 15.22 million current US$ Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Bahamas or Macao?
Macao, at 119.95 million current US$ against 108.83 million current US$ in Bahamas as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Bahamas and Macao?
11.12 million current US$, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Macao?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Bahamas and Macao rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Bahamas ranks 147th and Macao ranks 146th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Macao: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/bahamas-the/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/bahamas-the/macao-sar-china/">Bahamas vs Macao: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.