Australia vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Australia
16.94 billion current US$
in 2021
South Africa
19.07 billion current US$
in 2021
Australia rank
16th
South Africa rank
14th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Australia
  • South Africa
5.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B199020052021

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 19.07 billion current US$ against 16.94 billion current US$ in Australia, a difference of 2.13 billion current US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 14th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 4.40 billion current US$ 3.97 billion current US$ 432.38 million current US$ Australia
2000s 8.47 billion current US$ 8.49 billion current US$ 20.82 million current US$ South Africa
2010s 13.19 billion current US$ 14.81 billion current US$ 1.62 billion current US$ South Africa
2020s 16.42 billion current US$ 18.14 billion current US$ 1.71 billion current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Australia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 19.07 billion current US$ against 16.94 billion current US$ in Australia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Australia and South Africa?
2.13 billion current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Africa?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Australia and South Africa rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Australia ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 14th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/australia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/australia/south-africa/">Australia vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.