Aruba vs Puerto Rico: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Aruba
57.50 million current US$
in 2021
Puerto Rico
56.91 million current US$
in 2021
Aruba rank
162nd
Puerto Rico rank
164th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Aruba
  • Puerto Rico
050.0M100.0M150.0M197019952021

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 57.50 million current US$ against 56.91 million current US$ in Puerto Rico, a difference of 595,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Aruba ranks 162nd and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 209 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1970s 387,825 current US$ 5.23 million current US$ 4.84 million current US$ Puerto Rico
1980s 1.77 million current US$ 8.25 million current US$ 6.48 million current US$ Puerto Rico
1990s 10.95 million current US$ 13.75 million current US$ 2.80 million current US$ Puerto Rico
2000s 28.45 million current US$ 51.88 million current US$ 23.43 million current US$ Puerto Rico
2010s 50.31 million current US$ 99.42 million current US$ 49.11 million current US$ Puerto Rico
2020s 52.92 million current US$ 53.91 million current US$ 989,300 current US$ Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Aruba or Puerto Rico?
Aruba, at 57.50 million current US$ against 56.91 million current US$ in Puerto Rico as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Aruba and Puerto Rico?
595,000 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Puerto Rico?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Puerto Rico rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Aruba ranks 162nd and Puerto Rico ranks 164th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Puerto Rico: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/aruba/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/aruba/puerto-rico-us/">Aruba vs Puerto Rico: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.