Aruba vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage

Aruba
57.50 million current US$
in 2021
Malta
57.46 million current US$
in 2021
Aruba rank
162nd
Malta rank
163rd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage over time

  • Aruba
  • Malta
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M197019952021

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 57.50 million current US$ against 57.46 million current US$ in Malta, a difference of 47,300 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.

Aruba ranks 162nd and Malta ranks 163rd of 209 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 10.95 million current US$ 35.91 million current US$ 24.96 million current US$ Malta
2000s 28.45 million current US$ 58.54 million current US$ 30.09 million current US$ Malta
2010s 50.31 million current US$ 68.28 million current US$ 17.97 million current US$ Malta
2020s 52.92 million current US$ 56.72 million current US$ 3.80 million current US$ Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage, Aruba or Malta?
Aruba, at 57.50 million current US$ against 57.46 million current US$ in Malta as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage between Aruba and Malta?
47,300 current US$, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage?
Aruba ranks 162nd and Malta ranks 163rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/aruba/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us/aruba/malta/">Aruba vs Malta: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
209 places, 6,864 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Cost of damage due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the manufacture of cement, estimated to be US$40 per ton of CO2 (the unit damage in 2017 US dollars for CO2 emitted in 2020) times the number of tons of CO2 emitted. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.