Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Uganda
1,456 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zimbabwe
1,291 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Uganda rank
164th
Zimbabwe rank
165th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Uganda
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k199020052021

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 1,456 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,291 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 165 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Uganda ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 165th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 73.6 current US$ per square kilometre 615.04 current US$ per square kilometre 541.44 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 250.54 current US$ per square kilometre 610.1 current US$ per square kilometre 359.56 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 790.81 current US$ per square kilometre 1,026 current US$ per square kilometre 235.69 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 1,375 current US$ per square kilometre 1,220 current US$ per square kilometre 154.74 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Uganda or Zimbabwe?
Uganda, at 1,456 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,291 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Uganda and Zimbabwe?
165 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Uganda and Zimbabwe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Uganda ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 165th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/uganda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/uganda/zimbabwe/">Uganda vs Zimbabwe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.