Turks and Caicos Islands vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Turks and Caicos Islands
10,421 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Uzbekistan
11,279 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
98th
Uzbekistan rank
95th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Uzbekistan
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199220062021

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 11,279 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,421 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 858 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 95th of 208 countries.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 1,313 current US$ per square kilometre 6,654 current US$ per square kilometre 5,340 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2010s 7,788 current US$ per square kilometre 8,806 current US$ per square kilometre 1,018 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2020s 9,792 current US$ per square kilometre 10,932 current US$ per square kilometre 1,140 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Turks and Caicos Islands or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 11,279 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,421 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Turks and Caicos Islands and Uzbekistan?
858 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Uzbekistan?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Uzbekistan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 95th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/uzbekistan/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.