Sudan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Sudan
515.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Zambia
482.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sudan rank
193rd
Zambia rank
195th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Sudan
  • Zambia
0100200300400500199020052021

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 515.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 482.14 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 33.56 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.

Sudan ranks 193rd and Zambia ranks 195th of 208 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Zambia Difference Ahead
2010s 359.84 current US$ per square kilometre 272.18 current US$ per square kilometre 87.66 current US$ per square kilometre Sudan
2020s 492.91 current US$ per square kilometre 442.35 current US$ per square kilometre 50.56 current US$ per square kilometre Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Sudan or Zambia?
Sudan, at 515.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 482.14 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Sudan and Zambia?
33.56 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Sudan ranks 193rd and Zambia ranks 195th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zambia/">Sudan vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.