Slovenia vs Saint Lucia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Slovenia
29,359 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saint Lucia
32,276 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Slovenia rank
53rd
Saint Lucia rank
50th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Slovenia
  • Saint Lucia
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020052021

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 32,276 current US$ per square kilometre against 29,359 current US$ per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 2,917 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Slovenia ranks 53rd and Saint Lucia ranks 50th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 11,273 current US$ per square kilometre 8,735 current US$ per square kilometre 2,538 current US$ per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 18,046 current US$ per square kilometre 21,114 current US$ per square kilometre 3,068 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2010s 24,284 current US$ per square kilometre 30,824 current US$ per square kilometre 6,540 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia
2020s 27,844 current US$ per square kilometre 29,934 current US$ per square kilometre 2,090 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Slovenia or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 32,276 current US$ per square kilometre against 29,359 current US$ per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Slovenia and Saint Lucia?
2,917 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Saint Lucia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Slovenia and Saint Lucia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Slovenia ranks 53rd and Saint Lucia ranks 50th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Saint Lucia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/slovenia/st-lucia/">Slovenia vs Saint Lucia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.