How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turkey?

16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Serbia vs Turkey: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Serbia

25,140 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Turkey

25,541 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2021

Serbia rank

59th

Turkey rank

57th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

Serbia
Turkey

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 25,541 current US$ per square kilometre against 25,140 current US$ per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 401 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 59th and Turkey ranks 57th of 208 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Serbia	Turkey	Difference	Ahead
2000s	15,027 current US$ per square kilometre	9,583 current US$ per square kilometre	5,444 current US$ per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	18,083 current US$ per square kilometre	16,046 current US$ per square kilometre	2,038 current US$ per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	23,755 current US$ per square kilometre	23,687 current US$ per square kilometre	68.3 current US$ per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Serbia or Turkey?: Turkey, at 25,541 current US$ per square kilometre against 25,140 current US$ per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Serbia and Turkey?: 401 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turkey?: 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
How do Serbia and Turkey rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?: Serbia ranks 59th and Turkey ranks 57th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Turkey: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/serbia/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/serbia/turkiye/">Serbia vs Turkey: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.