Saudi Arabia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Saudi Arabia
10,667 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Turks and Caicos Islands
10,421 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saudi Arabia rank
97th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
98th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k199020052021

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 10,667 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,421 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 246 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 97th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 98th of 208 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 3,587 current US$ per square kilometre 1,313 current US$ per square kilometre 2,274 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 8,296 current US$ per square kilometre 7,788 current US$ per square kilometre 507.88 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 10,217 current US$ per square kilometre 9,792 current US$ per square kilometre 425.24 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Saudi Arabia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Saudi Arabia, at 10,667 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,421 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Saudi Arabia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
246 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Saudi Arabia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Saudi Arabia ranks 97th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 98th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/saudi-arabia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/saudi-arabia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Saudi Arabia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.