Sao Tome and Principe vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Sao Tome and Principe
7,422 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Turkmenistan
7,241 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe rank
112th
Turkmenistan rank
113th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Turkmenistan
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020052021

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 7,422 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,241 current US$ per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 181 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 112th and Turkmenistan ranks 113th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 776.1 current US$ per square kilometre 1,056 current US$ per square kilometre 280.39 current US$ per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2000s 1,761 current US$ per square kilometre 2,419 current US$ per square kilometre 657.46 current US$ per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2010s 4,497 current US$ per square kilometre 5,153 current US$ per square kilometre 656.49 current US$ per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 7,116 current US$ per square kilometre 6,952 current US$ per square kilometre 163.49 current US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Sao Tome and Principe or Turkmenistan?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 7,422 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,241 current US$ per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Sao Tome and Principe and Turkmenistan?
181 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Turkmenistan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Turkmenistan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 112th and Turkmenistan ranks 113th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sao-tome-and-principe/turkmenistan/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.