Oman vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Oman
11,380 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Saudi Arabia
10,667 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Oman rank
94th
Saudi Arabia rank
97th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Oman
  • Saudi Arabia
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020052021

How they compare

Oman currently reports 11,380 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,667 current US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 713 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Oman ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 97th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 855.68 current US$ per square kilometre 1,468 current US$ per square kilometre 612.34 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 2,602 current US$ per square kilometre 3,444 current US$ per square kilometre 841.93 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2010s 7,393 current US$ per square kilometre 8,296 current US$ per square kilometre 902.93 current US$ per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 10,778 current US$ per square kilometre 10,217 current US$ per square kilometre 561.06 current US$ per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Oman or Saudi Arabia?
Oman, at 11,380 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,667 current US$ per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Oman and Saudi Arabia?
713 current US$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Saudi Arabia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Oman and Saudi Arabia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Oman ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 97th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oman/saudi-arabia/">Oman vs Saudi Arabia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.