Nauru vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Nauru
130,384 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Trinidad and Tobago
130,743 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Nauru rank
20th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
19th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Nauru
  • Trinidad and Tobago
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k199020052021

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 130,743 current US$ per square kilometre against 130,384 current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 359 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nauru ahead.

Nauru ranks 20th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 19th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 81,198 current US$ per square kilometre 30,521 current US$ per square kilometre 50,677 current US$ per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 69,569 current US$ per square kilometre 74,902 current US$ per square kilometre 5,334 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 92,683 current US$ per square kilometre 134,223 current US$ per square kilometre 41,540 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 127,262 current US$ per square kilometre 128,925 current US$ per square kilometre 1,663 current US$ per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Nauru or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 130,743 current US$ per square kilometre against 130,384 current US$ per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Nauru and Trinidad and Tobago?
359 current US$ per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Nauru and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Nauru ranks 20th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 19th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/trinidad-and-tobago/">Nauru vs Trinidad and Tobago: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.