Namibia vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Namibia
220.8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Sudan
127.63 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia rank
200th
South Sudan rank
202nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Namibia
  • South Sudan
050100150200199120062021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre against 127.63 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 93.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.7 times South Sudan's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 200th and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 175.69 current US$ per square kilometre 91 current US$ per square kilometre 84.68 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 210.5 current US$ per square kilometre 122.09 current US$ per square kilometre 88.42 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Namibia or South Sudan?
Namibia, at 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre against 127.63 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Namibia and South Sudan?
93.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and South Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Namibia and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Namibia ranks 200th and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/south-sudan/">Namibia vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.