Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Montenegro
7,826 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sao Tome and Principe
7,422 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Montenegro rank
110th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
112th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Montenegro
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020052021

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 7,826 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,422 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 404 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Montenegro ranks 110th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 112th of 208 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 4,239 current US$ per square kilometre 2,324 current US$ per square kilometre 1,915 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 6,083 current US$ per square kilometre 4,497 current US$ per square kilometre 1,586 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2020s 7,269 current US$ per square kilometre 7,116 current US$ per square kilometre 153.56 current US$ per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Montenegro or Sao Tome and Principe?
Montenegro, at 7,826 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,422 current US$ per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
404 current US$ per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
How do Montenegro and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Montenegro ranks 110th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 112th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/montenegro/sao-tome-and-principe/">Montenegro vs Sao Tome and Principe: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.