Moldova vs Oman: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Moldova
12,047 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Oman
11,380 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Moldova rank
91st
Oman rank
94th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Moldova
  • Oman
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020052021

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 12,047 current US$ per square kilometre against 11,380 current US$ per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 667 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

Moldova ranks 91st and Oman ranks 94th of 208 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Moldova Oman Difference Ahead
1990s 5,740 current US$ per square kilometre 929.94 current US$ per square kilometre 4,810 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2000s 5,370 current US$ per square kilometre 2,602 current US$ per square kilometre 2,768 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2010s 8,515 current US$ per square kilometre 7,393 current US$ per square kilometre 1,122 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2020s 11,131 current US$ per square kilometre 10,778 current US$ per square kilometre 352.3 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Moldova or Oman?
Moldova, at 12,047 current US$ per square kilometre against 11,380 current US$ per square kilometre in Oman as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Moldova and Oman?
667 current US$ per square kilometre, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Oman?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Moldova and Oman rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Moldova ranks 91st and Oman ranks 94th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Moldova vs Oman: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/moldova/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/moldova/oman/">Moldova vs Oman: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.