Mauritania vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Mauritania
180.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Sudan
127.63 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mauritania rank
201st
South Sudan rank
202nd

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Mauritania
  • South Sudan
050100150200199020052021

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 180.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 127.63 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 53.12 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.4 times South Sudan's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 201st and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 114.4 current US$ per square kilometre 91 current US$ per square kilometre 23.4 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 171.74 current US$ per square kilometre 122.09 current US$ per square kilometre 49.66 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Mauritania or South Sudan?
Mauritania, at 180.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 127.63 current US$ per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Mauritania and South Sudan?
53.12 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and South Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Mauritania and South Sudan rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Mauritania ranks 201st and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/south-sudan/">Mauritania vs South Sudan: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.