Mauritania vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Mauritania
180.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Namibia
220.8 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Mauritania rank
201st
Namibia rank
200th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
050100150200199020052021

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre against 180.75 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 40.05 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 201st and Namibia ranks 200th of 208 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 17.1 current US$ per square kilometre 31.64 current US$ per square kilometre 14.54 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 38.22 current US$ per square kilometre 70.19 current US$ per square kilometre 31.96 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 105.29 current US$ per square kilometre 163.48 current US$ per square kilometre 58.19 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 171.74 current US$ per square kilometre 210.5 current US$ per square kilometre 38.76 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Mauritania or Namibia?
Namibia, at 220.8 current US$ per square kilometre against 180.75 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Mauritania and Namibia?
40.05 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Mauritania ranks 201st and Namibia ranks 200th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.