Malta vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Malta
179,551 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Netherlands
187,980 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Malta rank
14th
Netherlands rank
13th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Malta
  • Netherlands
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k199020052021

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 187,980 current US$ per square kilometre against 179,551 current US$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 8,429 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 14th and Netherlands ranks 13th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 3 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 112,214 current US$ per square kilometre 71,376 current US$ per square kilometre 40,838 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 182,927 current US$ per square kilometre 112,657 current US$ per square kilometre 70,269 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 213,362 current US$ per square kilometre 158,906 current US$ per square kilometre 54,456 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 177,249 current US$ per square kilometre 180,022 current US$ per square kilometre 2,772 current US$ per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Malta or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 187,980 current US$ per square kilometre against 179,551 current US$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Malta and Netherlands?
8,429 current US$ per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Netherlands?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Malta and Netherlands rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Malta ranks 14th and Netherlands ranks 13th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/netherlands/">Malta vs Netherlands: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.